Litigation Funding and Alternative Dispute Resolution – Exploring Positives and Negatives

George Washington University Law School and Fox Rothschild are hosting a discussion entitled "Litigation Funding and Alternative Dispute Resolution – Exploring Positives and Negatives" on Thursday, October 23,2025. Jonathan Stroud, General Counsel at Unified Patents, will join a panel of experienced litigators examining how third-party funding intersects with ADR strategies, including key benefits, potential pitfalls, and ethical considerations. Attendees will gain practical insights into leveraging litigation funding to manage risk and resolve disputes more efficiently.

Details about the event can be found on Fox Rothchild's website and are also provided below:

When: October 23, 2025 at 11:00am – 12:30pm EST

Hosted By: George Washington University Law School

Location: Faculty Conference Center; 716 20th Street NW, Washington DC

$2,000 for IP Investments Group entity, eComm Innovations, web layout patent prior art

Unified Patents added a new PATROLL contest, with a $2,000 cash prize, seeking prior art on at least claim 1 of U.S. Patent 7,409,635, owned by eComm Innovations LLC, an NPE and entity of IP Investments Group. The '635 patent focuses on advancements in data processing, specifically aiming at improving layout and rendering techniques in web and print publishing.

The contest will expire on November 22, 2025. Please visit PATROLL for more information and to submit an entry for the contest. PATROLL researchers are required to use Pearl to generate claim charts. Submitted invalidity charts must address every limitation of the challenged claim. This may require using more than one prior art reference. Each PATROLL researcher can generate up to 30 invalidity claim charts per month using Pearl. These charts can be downloaded then submitted to PATROLL.

Another Wilus Wi-Fi patent challenge instituted

On October 14, 2025, seven weeks after Unified filed an ex parte reexamination, the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) granted Unified’s request, finding substantial new questions of patentability on the challenged claims of U.S. Patent 10,931,396, owned and asserted by Wilus Institute of Standards & Technology, Inc., an entity of Good Day to Invent, Inc.

The '396 patent is generally directed wireless terminals that receive an A-MPDU (aggregated MAC protocol data unit) with a particular delimiter field that directs the device on the specific format of the response frame to transmit back. It has been asserted against Askey and its routers, which are Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) enabled devices. The '396 patent is related to U.S. Patent 11,664,926, which has been asserted against Samsung, HP Inc., and Askey.

View district court litigations by Wilus. Unified is represented by Michael Jones and Jake Rosvold of Rothwell Figg, and by in-house counsel, Jessica L.A. Marks and Vinu Raj, in this proceeding.

To view the reexamination request, visit Unified’s Portal: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/exparte/90015488

Unified files amicus in support of clarification of after-arising technology in Fed. Cir.

On October 1, 2025, Unified filed an amicus brief in MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Case No. 25-225). This brief relates to when after-arising technology may be used to assess compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 112.

Unified Patents is represented by Chad Landmon and Kendall Gurule with Polsinelli, and by in-house counsel, Jonathan Stroud. Download the amicus brief below.

AiPi entity, Gatekeeper Solutions, email filtering patent found invalid

On October 2, 2025, the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) entered a notice of intent to issue a reexamination certificate cancelling all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 9,032,038, owned and asserted by Gatekeeper Solutions, Inc., an NPE and entity of AiPi Solutions. The ‘038 patent relates to systems and methods for alerting a user of conflicting recipients when sending electronic communications. It has been asserted several times, but most recently against Darktrace, Forcepoint, and Trellix.

View district court litigations by Gatekeeper Solutions. Unified was represented by in-house counsel, Michelle Aspen and Jessica L.A. Marks, in this proceeding.

To view the reexamination request, visit Unified’s Portal: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/exparte/90019719